Â鶹Éç¹ú²ú

Skip to content

Opinion: There’s a laundry list of hot-button Â鶹Éç¹ú²úissues in the lead-up to the election

With a civic election just around the corner, this sustained barrage of grassroots discontent should encourage prospective council candidates to arrive on the hustings with an up-to-date understanding of the hot button issues related to commercial and residential development proposals in this community.
GettyImages-1834897Jorg Greuel83(1)
There are many issues for candidates to be up to date on, says columnist Helmut Manzl.

At one time, the pace of development in Â鶹Éç¹ú²úresembled a small pot simmering on the back burner.

These days, the tempo of change has taken on all the appearances of a sizable vat boiling over.

Local lobby groups have deployed various strategies to address a changing commercial landscape that many observers believe is rapidly lurching into objectionable territory.                                                         

Last November, during a town hall meeting spearheaded by the movement, residents voiced their opposition to the potential densification of the Garibaldi Estates.

The gathering was launched after a real estate broker delivered flyers to homes in the area, informing residents that more density could be on the horizon in the Estates because of the District’s upcoming neighbourhood planning process.

One attendee to the townhall asked council to create a citizen advisory committee to address community concerns about the process.

District staff answered that request. They issued a bulletin inviting interested individuals to host small discussion groups to help shape the .

More recently, a group of residents from the Wilson Crescent neighbourhood launched a petition urging the District to reconsider a section of an omnibus bylaw that would reduce rear setbacks.

Petitioners claimed the changes would impact the privacy, views, natural light and space of other neighbourhoods that are rezoned as RM-1, RM-2 or RM-3 in the future through neighbourhood planning.

Following that appeal and complaints heard at a public hearing, council deferred the rezoning process.                                               

Another prominent advocacy group, , bills itself as “a people-powered environmental organization.” 

It is founded in 2014 and is on a mission “to defend, protect, and restore Átl’ḵa7tsem/Howe Sound.”

From its inception, the association has been vigorously opposed to the planned Woodfibre LNG and associated FortisBC pipeline projects.

According to their website, they “organize educational events; coordinate research; build partnerships and respectful relationships; lift up First Nations voices and culture; and facilitate public engagement with our municipal, provincial, and federal governments.”

Last month Woodfibre LNG announced the project is being fast-tracked after Enbridge bought a 30% stake in the venture.

According to Eoin Finn, a spokesperson for the group, the upcoming Â鶹Éç¹ú²úmunicipal election is critical because the new council will be reviewing applications from Woodfibre LNG and FortisBC for temporary use permits for the floatel, the workcamp, and parking at Darrell Bay.

My Sea to Sky is planning flyer drops, door knocking, community events, and demonstrations in the lead-up to the election.               

An additional grassroots initiative backed by My Sea to Sky is the Crumpit Legacy movement formed to curb a proposed development in the North Crumpit area of Valleycliffe.

The organizers are advocating for protecting and restoring the area’s wetland ecosystem.

Two possible options to expedite that plan are being considered: a call for funding to purchase the land and ensure it can never be developed or a request that a small portion of the land is developed in a less sensitive habitat, with the remaining property designated as a community legacy.                            

When it comes to activist intervention, nothing tops the protracted battle to put the kibosh on the planned $3.5 billion Garibaldi at Â鶹Éç¹ú²úfour-season resort.

Initially, the Save Garibaldi group was the most prominent opponent of the project.

That consortium lobbied the council to petition the provincial government to prevent the venture from moving forward.

In addition, a loosely organized collection of lobbyists comprised of the UBC Varsity Outdoor Club, the Â鶹Éç¹ú²úAccess Society and the Federation of Mountain Clubs of BC have adamantly resisted .

Although those efforts delayed the undertaking, eventually, GAS was granted environmental certification, albeit linked to a catalogue of legally binding conditions. Forceful opposition has also come from the Paradise Valley Community Association, a group that challenged the prospect of the resort drawing water from the valley. As a result, GAS hydrogeological contractors and consultants have been investigating an on-mountain sourced water supply rather than taking it from the valley.

At this time, the company is working with the Â鶹Éç¹ú²úNation to revisit the Master Plan and engaging in work related to the Environmental Assessment Certification conditions. If everything goes as planned, the proponents are preparing for a launch sometime in 2028.                                                                

All in all, with a civic election just around the corner, this sustained barrage of grassroots discontent should encourage prospective council candidates to arrive on the hustings with an up-to-date understanding of the hot button issues related to commercial and residential development proposals in this community.                                                               

Helmut Manzl is a long-time Â鶹Éç¹ú²úresident and political commentator for the Â鶹Éç¹ú²ú.

 

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks