麻豆社国产

Parking in 麻豆社国产is a problem of entitlement, privilege, and sometimes, inconvenience. The District of 麻豆社国产(DOS) intends to solve this 鈥減roblem鈥� by framing paid parking on our public streets and parking lots as a climate solution that is 鈥渢ourist-based.鈥�

This is misleading. Just like the 鈥渢ourist-based鈥� no-camping bylaw that targets working locals and visitors (but negatively impacts locals more than tourists), this is paid parking for everyone, tourists and locals alike. A cash grab aimed to profit off others while pricing certain people out, furthering the class divide and the commodification and privatization of public lands.

Increasing the cost of car ownership before alternatives are in place is a regressive approach, as it hurts those who rely on street parking and who are financially struggling while leaving the wealthy and their private parkades unscathed.

Ironically, 麻豆社国产vehicle residents have been asking for a paid permit system for years, yet the DOS rejected this idea. In the end, it鈥檚 about who is seen as more valuable and desirable, isn鈥檛 it?

It is time the DOS address the realities of class and the colonial idea that land is a commodity to be used for 鈥渉ighest value鈥�. Instead of further privatizing public land, focusing on practical mobility alternatives (more buses, bike lanes, a one-stop paid parkade, etc.), may be a better idea.

If paid parking proceeds, a project that will cost tax-payers $600,000-plus to implement and will result in locals having to pay to use the adventure centre and Smoke Bluffs parking lots, it鈥檚 time to think about future council candidates who care more about people than helping private parking corporations profit off public land.

We must also consider 鈥渄emocracy鈥� and what that really means. I am referring to 麻豆社国产council鈥檚 approval of a motion to 鈥減rioritize the implementation of a paid-parking pilot鈥�, despite the fact that the survey is not yet complete. Like all DOS surveys, there鈥檚 no box to check 鈥渘o,鈥� leaving no way to show quantitative objection, but in the comments. I will not be surprised that even if survey data shows that the public doesn鈥檛 want this, they will proceed regardless in their patronizing 鈥渨e know better鈥� way.

麻豆社国产is not Whistler, and I鈥檓 sure many do not desire it to be so. Please say NO to paid parking.

Thomasina Pidgeon

Squamish