ATLANTA (AP) 鈥� A on Thursday removed from the case against Donald Trump and others but did not dismiss the indictment, leaving the future of the prosecution uncertain.
Citing 鈥渢he appearance of impropriety鈥� by Willis that might not typically warrant such a removal, the court said in a 2-1 ruling that 鈥渢his is the rare case in which disqualification is mandated and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings.鈥�
The case against Trump and more than a dozen others had already been largely stalled for months while the Georgia Court of Appeals considered the pretrial appeal.
The 2-1 ruling by the appeals court panel means it will be up to the Prosecuting Attorneys鈥� Council of Georgia to find another prosecutor to take over the case and to decide whether to continue to pursue it, though that could be delayed if Willis decides to appeal to the state Supreme Court. A trial judge in March had set conditions that allowed Willis to stay on the case.
It's the latest legal victory for Trump as he prepares for a return to power in a second term, further underscoring how criminal cases that just one year ago threatened to impede Trump鈥檚 political career and put him in personal jeopardy have now tilted in his favor.
And Trump's team cheered the state court's decision.
"In granting President Trump an overwhelming mandate, the American People have demanded an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all the Witch Hunts against him. We look forward to uniting our country as President Trump Makes America Great Again,鈥� spokesperson Steven Cheung said.
The development comes weeks after Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith abandoned two federal prosecutions against the incoming president, and as sentencing in a separate is indefinitely on hold as a result of Trump鈥檚 victory in November over Democratic President Joe Biden.
Even so, the practical consequences for Trump may be minimal given the virtual impossibility of trying to proceed with a criminal case against a sitting president, no matter the supervisor of the prosecution. But there are 14 other defendants who still face charges.
Representatives for Willis and Trump鈥檚 lead attorney in Georgia did not immediately respond Thursday to text messages seeking comment on the ruling.
The majority opinion by the appeals court panel said 鈥渢he remedy crafted by the trial court to prevent an ongoing appearance of impropriety did nothing to address the appearance of impropriety that existed at times when DA Willis was exercising her broad pretrial discretion about who to prosecute and what charges to bring.鈥�
A grand jury in Atlanta indicted Trump and 18 others in August 2023, accusing them of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally try to overturn Trump鈥檚 narrow 2020 presidential election loss in Georgia. Four of them have since pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. Trump and the others have pleaded not guilty.
Trump and some of the remaining defendants tried to get Willis and her office removed from the case and to have the case dismissed. They argued that her romantic relationship with created a conflict of interest and that she made improper public statements about the case.
Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee, the trial court judge, ruled in March that that should force Willis off the case. Trump and the others appealed that ruling.
McAfee wrote that the prosecution was 鈥渆ncumbered by an appearance of impropriety.鈥� He said Willis could remain on the case only if Wade left; the special prosecutor submitted his resignation hours later.
The allegations that Willis had improperly benefited from her romance with Wade resulted in a tumultuous couple of months in the case as intimate details of Willis and Wade鈥檚 personal lives were . Trump and others also argued that public comments Willis made in the wake of the revelation of the relationship improperly disparaged the defendants and their lawyers.
The allegations against Willis first surfaced in a motion filed in early January by Ashleigh Merchant, a lawyer for former Trump campaign staffer and onetime White House aide Michael Roman. The motion alleged that Willis and Wade were involved in an inappropriate romantic relationship and that Willis paid Wade large sums for his work and then benefited when he paid for lavish vacations.
Willis and Wade acknowledged the relationship but said they didn鈥檛 begin dating until the spring of 2022. Wade was hired in November 2021, and their romance ended last summer. They also testified that they split travel costs roughly evenly, with Willis often paying expenses or reimbursing Wade in cash.
Speaking in Atlanta soon after the relationship was revealed, Willis defended Wade鈥檚 qualifications and her own leadership of her office. Defense lawyers said that speech included a series of improper and prejudicial comments against the defendants and their legal team, poisoning any potential jurors against them.
Kate Brumback, The Associated Press
