WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� The Justice Department said Wednesday that it will release findings on but will keep under wraps for now the rest of the report focused on the .
The revelation was made in a filing to a federal appeals court that was considering of the two-volume report while charges remain pending against two Trump co-defendants in the Florida case accusing the Republican former president and current president-elect of illegally holding classified documents. Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed judge presiding over the classified documents case, granted the request Tuesday, issuing a temporary block on the report.
The Justice Department said it would proceed with plans to release the first of two volumes centered on the election interference case but would make the classified documents section of the report available only to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees for their private review as long as the case against Trump's co-defendants 鈥� and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira 鈥� is ongoing.
鈥淭his limited disclosure will further the public interest in keeping congressional leadership apprised of a significant matter within the Department while safeguarding defendants鈥� interests,鈥� the filing said.
It was not immediately clear when the election interference report might be released. The filing asks the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to reverse Cannon's order that appeared to at least temporarily halt the release of the entire report.
In its filing, the Justice Department said that the attorney general鈥檚 authority to publicly release the election interference section of the special counsel鈥檚 report is 鈥渃lear鈥� and that Trump鈥檚 co-defendants have no legal argument to block the disclosure of a section that has nothing to do with them.
鈥淚ndeed, with respect to Volume One of the Final Report, defendants are hardly differently situated than any other member of the public,鈥� the department said.
The report is expected to detail findings and charging decisions in Smith's two investigations.
The classified documents inquiry was dismissed in July by Cannon, who concluded that Smith鈥檚 appointment was illegal. Smith's appeal of the dismissal of charges against Nauta and De Oliveira, who were charged alongside Trump with obstructing the investigation, is still active, and their lawyers argued this week that the release of a report while proceedings were pending would be prejudicial and unfair.
The election interference case was . The court ruled then for the first time that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution, all but ending prospects Trump could be tried before the November election.
Smith鈥檚 team abandoned both cases in November after Trump鈥檚 presidential victory, citing Justice Department policy that prohibits the federal prosecutions of sitting presidents.
Justice Department regulations call for special counsels appointed by the attorney general to submit a confidential report at the conclusion of their investigations. It鈥檚 then up to the attorney general to decide what to make public.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has made public in their entirety the reports produced by special counsels who operated under his watch, including on President Joe Biden鈥檚 handling of classified information and on the FBI鈥檚 Russian election interference investigation.
Eric Tucker And Alanna Durkin Richer, The Associated Press
